You are viewing the documentation for Blueriq 14. Documentation for other versions is available in our documentation directory.
Testing Pyramid
“Quality is more important than quantity. One home run is much better than two doubles.” – Steve Jobs
The testing pyramid is often used in agile environments to set up a testing strategy. In this video the quality pyramid is explained on a basic level, but also the advantages of using the testing pyramid. At Blueriq we use this pyramid to setup up our automated test. By doing this, we maximize the benefit of creating automated tests.
http://www.agilenutshell.com/episodes/41-testing-pyramid
The testing pyramid and Blueriq
Most organizations without realizing use the testing pyramid in an inverted manner (see picture below). This is because most projects create a lot of tests on their user interface by using for example Selenium, or any other automated framework that runs tests against the user interface. To make the feedback loop as short as possible it is advisable to change this inverted way of working to match the testing pyramid. This results in:
- less scope change
- less related code
- fewer people involved and
- bugs which are found are cheaper to solve than at the end of the lifecycle
Boehm's law
The graph of Boehm visually describes that costs will exponential increase when bugs are found in the development process. This supports the integration of early testing in the agile sprint teams and creating most tests during development (in the scrum team).
Using the test pyramid, you can draft a test strategy against a standard setup of Blueriq. Which is made visible in the picture below.
Mapping a standard Blueriq environment on the testing pyramid gives the following insight:
- Studio should be tested with unit tests
- Runtime/ BAAS / Rest API should be tested with service and API layer tests
- Front-end (Guided User Interface) should be tested with User interface tests
In this combined model of Blueriq and the testing pyramid, most of the tests are on the lowest level of the pyramid. This results in the following benefits:
- Cost to develop and maintain automated test is up-to-par
- Execution time on automated tests is optimal
- Possibility of false negatives is decreased
- Increase in coverage closest to the team
Agile test quadrants
For customers our advice is to use the agile testing quadrant to make a testing strategy of which type of tests you want to execute and which risks they mitigate. In this paragraph, we show how this can be implemented for Blueriq from a customer point of view. Keep in mind that every IT landscape has its own specific challenges.
“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different outcomes.” – Einstein
Agile Testing Quadrant in spreadsheet
In the previous section is a visual image of the testing strategy. In this section we give an example on how the Agile testing quadrant can be implemented (Who, Why and How ?).
For the Q3 quadrant (business facing) we do not have a proposal because this is always customer specific.
Testing type | Possible Assignees | Targeting | Reasoning | Tool which can be used | Used at Blueriq |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit testing Model testing (Q1) | Business engineers and testers | All the new models | Ensuring that the model is correctly developed. According to standards | ||
API / Logic / Page models (Q2) | Business engineers and testers | Functionalities implemented in new stories, past issues or bugs with high recurrence. Testing on the page modeling and exposed services | Checking to see if the Runtime is working correctly on the developed models, both functional and remaining logic which is not tested in the unit/model layer. | • Cucumber • Selenium • Ranorex • Etc | •Ready API / Soap UI |
GUI testing (Q2) | Testers | The graphic interface and its logic, For example, the view controller | Making sure no GUI related bugs are introduced when committing new code | • Testcafe • Other capture and playback tool | •Backstop JS |
User testing (Q3) | Customer specific | The actual future user is testing the software. This to check the interaction between the users and the software. | Ensuring that the user has the correct interaction with the software and that the user can interact with the software | Manual interaction of the customer is needed. | Manual interaction with the users |
Performance (Q4) | Development team / External expertise (Testers) | All the Blueriq components (Studio, Runtime, Publisher) | Verifying how Blueriq behaves when it comes to processing time and reliability | •Apache JMeter | |
Security (Q4) | Development team / External expertise (Testers) | The Runtime and its relation to other third parties’ components. | Keeping and improving security standards for our application | • OWASP ZAP |
Performance
“Just as athletes can’t win without a sophisticated mixture of strategy, form, attitude, tactics, and speed, performance engineering requires a good collection of metrics and tools to deliver the desired business results.” — Todd DeCapua
By using the complete performance test project that Blueriq has developed, it is possible to test the IT environment of the deployed Blueriq application. If there are significant differences in the results between Blueriq and the specific installation, then there could be hardware issues involved (e.g., server, network, client). After doing this initial check it is advised to create a performance test with for example JMeter in your own environment. As an advice to our customers, we strongly advise to include performance test from the beginning of the project In this way the performance can be monitored from the start and you lower the risks of not having an acceptable performance when introducing applications with Blueriq to production.
Performance information:
Performance tests are introduced from Blueriq 9.9: Performance reports
Modeling and performance tips: Performance Tuning
For more information on these performance services please contact our support desk.
Security
“Testing is an infinite process of comparing the invisible to the ambiguous in order to avoid the unthinkable happening to the anonymous.”— James Bach
Developing secure software is critical to a company’s reputation and revenue. Blueriq customers feel the legal and financial pressure to assure the security of their (mission-critical) applications and have strong regulatory and privacy requirements to protect private data. Therefore security is treated at highest priority in the development of Blueriq.
To introduce the security checks in an agile development process the following advice needs to be taken into consideration:
Penetration test
Keep in mind that it is advisable that a penetration test is advised on a production environment before your Blueriq application goes live.
OWASP Dependency Checker
A dependency checker is a utility that identifies project dependencies and checks if there are any known, publicly disclosed, vulnerabilities in 3rd party components. This dependency checker is integrated into our Jenkins CI server. The OWASP Dependency-check is used to scan our dependent libraries to identify any known vulnerable components. The core engine contains a series of analyzers that inspect the dependencies, collect pieces of information about the dependencies (referred to as evidence within the tool). The evidence is then used to identify the Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) for the given dependency. If a CPE is identified, a listing of associated Common Vulnerability and Exposure (CVE) entries are listed in a report.
Dependency-Check updates using the NVD Data Feeds. For more information about the dependency, checker see: OWASP dependency plugin (Jenkins). The standard libraries with Blueriq are checked this way. When using extra libraries, it is advisable to run the tool also over the additional libraries.
OWASP ZAP
The OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is one of the world’s most popular free security tools and is actively maintained by hundreds of international volunteers. It is used as a proxy to run selenium tests through and then ZAP can spider further throughout the complete application. ZAP attacks the application with the most popular (OWASP top10) attacks such as injections, clickjacking, XSS, csrf. ZAP should run every night to detect important vulnerabilities which are introduced by new code.
READY API
For more information, see: https://smartbear.com/
Why did we choose READY API as our test automation tool?
- Non technical interface
- JDBC connections
- Composite projects with GIT integration
- Dynamic environments
- Reusable test cases (Libraries)
- Data driven testing
- CI (Jenkins) integration
Ready API examples
As an example project we provide a Ready API example project on the 'Kinderbijslag' studio project. The 'kinderbijslag' project is delivered in the standard of Blueriq as an studio example project.
The explanation and instructions of the Ready API projects as downloadable below will follow soon. (Please notice: The projects only work with Ready API)
8 Comments
Vincent Jansen
zeker bla bal
Roel van de Steeg
Hi Unknown User (m.van.kessel) dit plaatje hieronder is niet duidelijk te lezen.
Overigens moi dat je theorie mapt naar Blueriq
Maarten Damen
And weg halen
Maarten Damen
zin is volgens mij niet echt lekker engels
Maarten Damen
er bij zetten dat dit geadviseerd wordt vanaf de start van het project?
Maarten Damen
Ik snap niet wat je hier mee bedoeld. de flexibiliteit in blueriq zorgt er voor dat je een perfomance test kan draaien?
Maarten Damen
Wat is live on an environment? Bedoel je gewoon in productie zetten of ook op OTA? Ik neem aan het eerste, maar misschien dan ook gewoon zo noemen?
Maarten Damen
dit wordt sowieso niet aangeraden?!